Talking heads on the both left and the right in America praised Trump’s decision to drop bombs on Syria, a move that could lead to unintended consequences and wars. But one group seemed strangely silent: the anti-war left.
Where is the anti-war left?
During the Bush years, libertarians and anti-war liberals became allies with a common goal: stop the wars.
But ever since Obama was elected, the anti-war left has been strangely quiet.
American liberals have been in denial for eight years as Obama increased drone wars and special operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. Obama ended his bloody reign by dropping more than 26,000 bombs in 2016, giving himself the record for being at war longer than any U.S. President in history.
Now that Trump is continuing Obama’s drone wars, the American political class seems confused about whether or not they should support Trump’s bombings in Syria.
As Ann Coulter noted:
“Cable news hosts gushed, ‘Trump became president of the United States tonight!’ On MSNBC, Brian Williams called the bombing ‘beautiful’ three times in less than a minute. Sen. Lindsey Graham (one of the ‘women of the Senate,’ according to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) compared Trump to Reagan. The New York Times headlined an article, ‘On Syria Attack, Trump’s Heart Came First.’”
A few anti-war democrats have been brave enough to speak against Trump’s military actions, such as Tulsi Gabbard, Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich, but the voices have been marginalized by the now pro-war Democratic party.
As the drumbeat continues to grow louder for a future American war with Syria and North Korea, libertarians are discovering that they are almost completely alone in the fight against endless wars.
Anti-war liberals need to wake up from their eight-year-long hibernation and make friends again with libertarians and anti-war conservatives to voice opposition to Trump’s bombs. The development of an anti-war coalition may be the only way to prevent a future world war.